The official blog of Troy LaPlante of Selma, NC. Find more of Troy's online presence at troylaplante.com
Showing posts with label second amendment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label second amendment. Show all posts
Monday, January 21, 2013
Sadly, this is how government looks at your rights
I see Wake County Sheriff Donnie Harrison on this video. He acted more like Barney Fife, unfortunately. I found it interesting that one Sheriff cited constitutional law and then turned around and cited Marbury vs. Madison, which was a usurpation of the US Constitution, but it did have an ill conceived precedent in the NC cast of Bayard vs. Singleton. The people in that meeting attempt to bring to the forefront a valid point about unalienable rights. As stated in the Declaration of Independence, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." The very definition of unalienable is "Not to be separated, given away, or taken away". To cite a usurpation as a precedent to exercise usurpation is hardly unalienable.
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Friday, January 30, 2009
A letter I sent both of my US Senators
I strongly urge you to vote against Eric Holder's nomination for Attorney General. He has a long history of being unfriendly to something as fundamental as the right to keep and bear arms. This is a guarantee that was fought for when the Bill of Rights was founded, and this freedom has constantly been eroded over time. To have someone with a disdain and disrespect for this right as the chief law enforcement officer of the nation would be an act of injustice towards law abiding Americans. Please act to block the confirmation of Eric Holder.
You can do the same.
Richard Burr - 202-224-3154,
http://burr.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.ContactForm
Kay Hagan - 202-224-6342, Senator_Hagan@hagan.senate.gov.
Labels:
attorney general,
confirmation,
eric holder,
second amendment,
Senate
Thursday, June 26, 2008
SCOTUS tells us what we already knew...the 2nd Amendment is a personal right...DUH!
In another 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court ruled that the right to keep and bear arms, including handguns, is a personal Constitutional right. That was obvious to me, but what shocks me is that it is not obvious to four of nine Supreme Court Justices. Basically, four justices attempted to amend the Constitution by fiat and failed. The vote NEVER should have even been close. It just goes to show that liberals (and it was the liberal justices who dissented) are out to control your lives and are willing to do so via the court system since they can not successfully do it via legislation or the amendment process as prescribed by the Constitution itself.
After reading about the court's decision, I was driving down the road and listened to Rush Limbaugh opining about the same thing, that four justices had tried to subvert our rights. I had already had that conversation with my buddy this morning, and here the same discussion was on the radio. I am glad that there are some people that are not so blind and can easily see things for what they are.
Here is the news story on the decision, and here is the decision itself. I have been reading and loving the logic of Justice Scalia's opinion. He uses strong language against the dissenting opinions, even calling them absurdity and grotesque. I love this guy. Finally, it is in an opinion for the nation to follow.
After reading about the court's decision, I was driving down the road and listened to Rush Limbaugh opining about the same thing, that four justices had tried to subvert our rights. I had already had that conversation with my buddy this morning, and here the same discussion was on the radio. I am glad that there are some people that are not so blind and can easily see things for what they are.
Here is the news story on the decision, and here is the decision itself. I have been reading and loving the logic of Justice Scalia's opinion. He uses strong language against the dissenting opinions, even calling them absurdity and grotesque. I love this guy. Finally, it is in an opinion for the nation to follow.
Labels:
decision,
gun rights,
second amendment,
supreme court
Monday, June 16, 2008
Why have concealed carry in NC?
From an online forum, the question of how to answer a question on a CCW application, "Why do you want a concealed carry permit?" There were some answers from others. Here was my response.
Several answers come to mind.
1. Because a police officer is too heavy to carry around.
2. To exercise my Second Amendment RIGHT. Rights should not require permits.
3. Because my CCW permit is a convenient tool as it doubles as a handgun purchase purchase permit instead of individual permits for each purchase (at least here in NC, don't know about elsewhere)
4. Because I always wanted to spend $90 to exercise my rights.
5. Because I always wanted to spend $90 to be fingerprinted and investigated.
6. Because it is a convenient way to find out if I am indeed a criminal, since I do not have personal access to NICS.
Labels:
2nd amendment,
civil rights,
concealed carry,
guns,
permit,
second amendment
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)